Why Lots of Feminists Are Dumb

I'm a black 18 year old male prospective engineer at one of the top 5 engineering schools in the nation. I like playing vidya games, debating, playing guitar, and making womyn mad through utilization of logic and common sense.

This blog was created to expose the logical fallacies vehemently promoted by feminists. I don't hate anyone for having different beliefs. If you want to clarify something to me to help better understand your cause or position on something please just send me a message.


***CHALLENGE OF THE CENTURY FOR FEMINISTS READING THIS BLOG**** Can one self-proclaimed feminist please tell me ONE thing they have done to mitigate the societal discrepancies between men and women besides calling everyone who doesn’t agree with their ideology on the Internet “misogynists” and commenting “this is why we need feminism” on every single post even remotely related to gender?





Reblogged from Just Me (christyna-c)
tenaflyviper:

“IF the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely.”
— Heather Mac Donald, "The Campus Rape Myth".
This alleged “statistic” was culled from a survey of 3,000 college women in 1982, conducted by Ms. Magazine.  These women were asked only three questions:
Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force to make you?
Have you had sexual acts when you didn’t want to because a man threatened to use some degree of physical force to make you?
The trouble is, many of the women the survey counted as “victims” did not actually feel that they had been raped, especially not the entire third of the alleged “victims” that continued to have a consensual sexual relationship with their supposed attacker.  Others that had consensual one-night-stands that they later regretted were also counted as “victims”. 
When you have to lie about the prevalence of a crime, you’re not doing women any favors.
Feminism is supposed to be empowering, not to send us cowering.
Rape is not the “epidemic” that people are trying to claim it is.  It has actually decreased dramatically in the past few decades - up to 80% since 1979, despite an increase in the willingness of victims to report them.  This is even further supported by data directly from the U.S. Bureau of Justice.
The only thing that HAS been increasing are FALSE reports of rape, which do a lot more harm to the lives of others than you may want to believe.
Third wave feminism is operating under far too many logical fallacies.  The Big Lie Technique is readily apparent in the use of the very “statistic” above which has time and again been proven to be false.  Overgeneralization continually tries to paint all men as monsters, when science has shown us that there are many psychological and biological factors that come into play to create someone with the potential to commit violence. 
If you have to spread lies to support your cause, how much of a cause could you possibly have to begin with?  And what are you saying about femininity itself when you want so badly for us to live in constant fear?
How is this supposed to be encouraging women to be strong if all you let us aspire to is to be victims?
How is this encouraging women to be independent if you try to make us believe that we can’t take care of ourselves?
How are you helping women at all if you have to lie to us?

If only feminists were capable of using their brains — they wouldn’t necessitate any research to determine that the “1 in 4 women” statistic is bullshit. Good job with this post! tenaflyviper:

“IF the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely.”
— Heather Mac Donald, "The Campus Rape Myth".
This alleged “statistic” was culled from a survey of 3,000 college women in 1982, conducted by Ms. Magazine.  These women were asked only three questions:
Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force to make you?
Have you had sexual acts when you didn’t want to because a man threatened to use some degree of physical force to make you?
The trouble is, many of the women the survey counted as “victims” did not actually feel that they had been raped, especially not the entire third of the alleged “victims” that continued to have a consensual sexual relationship with their supposed attacker.  Others that had consensual one-night-stands that they later regretted were also counted as “victims”. 
When you have to lie about the prevalence of a crime, you’re not doing women any favors.
Feminism is supposed to be empowering, not to send us cowering.
Rape is not the “epidemic” that people are trying to claim it is.  It has actually decreased dramatically in the past few decades - up to 80% since 1979, despite an increase in the willingness of victims to report them.  This is even further supported by data directly from the U.S. Bureau of Justice.
The only thing that HAS been increasing are FALSE reports of rape, which do a lot more harm to the lives of others than you may want to believe.
Third wave feminism is operating under far too many logical fallacies.  The Big Lie Technique is readily apparent in the use of the very “statistic” above which has time and again been proven to be false.  Overgeneralization continually tries to paint all men as monsters, when science has shown us that there are many psychological and biological factors that come into play to create someone with the potential to commit violence. 
If you have to spread lies to support your cause, how much of a cause could you possibly have to begin with?  And what are you saying about femininity itself when you want so badly for us to live in constant fear?
How is this supposed to be encouraging women to be strong if all you let us aspire to is to be victims?
How is this encouraging women to be independent if you try to make us believe that we can’t take care of ourselves?
How are you helping women at all if you have to lie to us?

If only feminists were capable of using their brains — they wouldn’t necessitate any research to determine that the “1 in 4 women” statistic is bullshit. Good job with this post!

tenaflyviper:

IF the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely.

— Heather Mac Donald, "The Campus Rape Myth".

This alleged “statistic” was culled from a survey of 3,000 college women in 1982, conducted by Ms. Magazine.  These women were asked only three questions:

  1. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
  2. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force to make you?
  3. Have you had sexual acts when you didn’t want to because a man threatened to use some degree of physical force to make you?

The trouble is, many of the women the survey counted as “victims” did not actually feel that they had been raped, especially not the entire third of the alleged “victims” that continued to have a consensual sexual relationship with their supposed attacker.  Others that had consensual one-night-stands that they later regretted were also counted as “victims”. 

When you have to lie about the prevalence of a crime, you’re not doing women any favors.

Feminism is supposed to be empowering, not to send us cowering.

Rape is not the “epidemic” that people are trying to claim it is.  It has actually decreased dramatically in the past few decades - up to 80% since 1979, despite an increase in the willingness of victims to report them.  This is even further supported by data directly from the U.S. Bureau of Justice.

The only thing that HAS been increasing are FALSE reports of rape, which do a lot more harm to the lives of others than you may want to believe.

Third wave feminism is operating under far too many logical fallacies.  The Big Lie Technique is readily apparent in the use of the very “statistic” above which has time and again been proven to be false.  Overgeneralization continually tries to paint all men as monsters, when science has shown us that there are many psychological and biological factors that come into play to create someone with the potential to commit violence

If you have to spread lies to support your cause, how much of a cause could you possibly have to begin with?  And what are you saying about femininity itself when you want so badly for us to live in constant fear?

How is this supposed to be encouraging women to be strong if all you let us aspire to is to be victims?

How is this encouraging women to be independent if you try to make us believe that we can’t take care of ourselves?

How are you helping women at all if you have to lie to us?

If only feminists were capable of using their brains — they wouldn’t necessitate any research to determine that the “1 in 4 women” statistic is bullshit. Good job with this post!

poppypicklesticks:

raider-nails:

penofham:

penofham:

Anyone who reblogs this with a load of text trying to justify their shitty actions is only further proving my point, so I dare you.

I fixed a painfully obvious spelling mistake. Please reblog this version.

I could not agree more

Not to mention the number of SJWs who are proudly homophobic (its okay for a feminist to be homophobic against gay men) transphobic (again its okay to shit on trans men teehee) transphobic in general (TERFs and the transtrenders who call trans people “truscum” and actually campaign to dislodge them from their own movement) 
poppypicklesticks:

raider-nails:

penofham:

penofham:

Anyone who reblogs this with a load of text trying to justify their shitty actions is only further proving my point, so I dare you.

I fixed a painfully obvious spelling mistake. Please reblog this version.

I could not agree more

Not to mention the number of SJWs who are proudly homophobic (its okay for a feminist to be homophobic against gay men) transphobic (again its okay to shit on trans men teehee) transphobic in general (TERFs and the transtrenders who call trans people “truscum” and actually campaign to dislodge them from their own movement) 
poppypicklesticks:

raider-nails:

penofham:

penofham:

Anyone who reblogs this with a load of text trying to justify their shitty actions is only further proving my point, so I dare you.

I fixed a painfully obvious spelling mistake. Please reblog this version.

I could not agree more

Not to mention the number of SJWs who are proudly homophobic (its okay for a feminist to be homophobic against gay men) transphobic (again its okay to shit on trans men teehee) transphobic in general (TERFs and the transtrenders who call trans people “truscum” and actually campaign to dislodge them from their own movement) 
poppypicklesticks:

raider-nails:

penofham:

penofham:

Anyone who reblogs this with a load of text trying to justify their shitty actions is only further proving my point, so I dare you.

I fixed a painfully obvious spelling mistake. Please reblog this version.

I could not agree more

Not to mention the number of SJWs who are proudly homophobic (its okay for a feminist to be homophobic against gay men) transphobic (again its okay to shit on trans men teehee) transphobic in general (TERFs and the transtrenders who call trans people “truscum” and actually campaign to dislodge them from their own movement) 
poppypicklesticks:

raider-nails:

penofham:

penofham:

Anyone who reblogs this with a load of text trying to justify their shitty actions is only further proving my point, so I dare you.

I fixed a painfully obvious spelling mistake. Please reblog this version.

I could not agree more

Not to mention the number of SJWs who are proudly homophobic (its okay for a feminist to be homophobic against gay men) transphobic (again its okay to shit on trans men teehee) transphobic in general (TERFs and the transtrenders who call trans people “truscum” and actually campaign to dislodge them from their own movement) 

poppypicklesticks:

raider-nails:

penofham:

penofham:

Anyone who reblogs this with a load of text trying to justify their shitty actions is only further proving my point, so I dare you.

I fixed a painfully obvious spelling mistake. Please reblog this version.

I could not agree more

Not to mention the number of SJWs who are proudly homophobic (its okay for a feminist to be homophobic against gay men) transphobic (again its okay to shit on trans men teehee) transphobic in general (TERFs and the transtrenders who call trans people “truscum” and actually campaign to dislodge them from their own movement) 

surethattotallyhappened:

HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA THAT ‘DOCTOR’ IS FROM THE ONION
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

surethattotallyhappened:

HAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHA
THAT ‘DOCTOR’ IS FROM THE ONION

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

She’s right. This third wave feminism has become a competition to see who is the most oppressed and who is the most tolerant of everyone else (while simultaneously being intolerant of everyone who doesn’t agree with them). It’s pathetic. Just stop.

When young women say no to feminism, feminists don’t accept that no means no.

Christina H. Sommers

Fat activism and body positivity

Sort of unrelated to bashing feminism (but directly related to bashing flawed ideology), but here are my thoughts about “fat activism” and “body positivity” shit on tumblr:

If you’re overweight, that’s fine and if you’re happy with being overweight, that’s also fine. But don’t promote it as a healthy lifestyle. It’s okay to love your body, but it’s still unhealthy.

Also, I know that there are irrational feminists, because every group of people has a crazy faction. But...feminism is still important. I mean, as long as the goal remains the same (gender equality) and remains reasonable (meaning no blind hatred of all things male or calling everything sexist), I think feminism is still ok. Right? Because not everything is equal, and nothing will ever be completely equal. Things like sexism and racism will always be around, but we can at least work against it.

Asked by its-a-reallyfunnystory


But the end goal isn’t the same. I see gender equality as men and women sharing the same amount of benefits and the same amount of adversity. Most feminists see gender equality as receiving the same benefits as men but not the same adversity. 

The problem with the feminist movement is that it directly contradicts the definition of equality. 

Hey, you probably get a lot of asks like this but: I am a feminist, and I consider feminism=equality regardless of gender, specifically a fight against situations where a person's gender is made to be a weakness. I will probably end up leaving a few asks, but my primary thing with this blog is that I'm getting the impression that you feel like drunk consent and the prospect that a lot of rape is a result of women leading men on are legitimate. I don't think that's what you're trying to say...

Asked by its-a-reallyfunnystory


Somewhat. I believe that if a woman is drunk and comes onto a man (whether he is intoxicated or not) it shouldn’t be considered rape. I do believe a man drugging a woman, coercing a woman, or physically forcing a woman to have sex with her is rape. I don’t believe that if a woman facilitates sexual intercourse due to her own voluntary inebriation the man should be at fault. However, despite what I believe, it seems second nature for a man to be considered guilty of any sex crime he is accused of until proven innocent, which is something I hate.

Hope this doesn't come across rude or provocative, but how has egalitarianism brought about modern change? You have said that feminists (at least 3rd wave feminists) do nothing but blog as if that brings about change. What do egalitarians do? (Not trying to argue via ad hominem, I am honestly curious)

Asked by its-a-reallyfunnystory


I understand. I don’t believe egalitarianism has brought about modern change (not significantly at least). However, the difference between the successes of egalitarians and feminists is that one claims what they are doing is working without results (feminism), while the other makes no such claim at all. 

Do you even know what feminism is? Because judging by your url, you don't.

Asked by crunkashton


I seriously hate having to repeat things more than once… 

The URL makes the implication that the feminist movement does not promote actual equality. Judging by your question, you clearly lack reading comprehension skills. 

Theme by A Guy Named Ruchir